Home
About Us
Information & Guidelines
Article Processing Charges
Open Access Policy
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Information For Authors
Information Editorial Board
Contact Us
FAQ
Paper Submission Guideline
Register
Login
Submit Now
Vol - 29, Issue - 01
Full-Text PDF
About the Journal
Download
[This article belongs to Volume - 29, Issue - 01]
International Medical Journal
Journal ID
:
IMJ-02-01-2022-1132
Total View
:
464
Title
:
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FLAP RECONSTRUCTION VERSUS EXCISION TECHNIQUE FOR PILONIDAL SINUS
Abstract
: To determine the advantages and disadvantages of flap reconstruction surgery and open excision with direct closure method for treatment of pilonidal sinus. The article presents materials on prospective observational study of 50 patients of pilonidal sinus of which 25 patients underwent flap reconstruction and the other 25 underwent open excision and primary closure. Time taken for complete healing and return to work were recorded. Post operative complications such as (wound infection, collection, dehiscence) were more common in open excision group than in the flap reconstruction group. Mean follow-up was 6 months. A significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay, time taken for complete healing, wound infection(P<0.001), recurrence rates. In flap group the infection, wound dehiscence and recurrence are lower than the open group. Flap reconstructions were superior to primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus and that Limberg flap was superior with regard to wound infection and recurrence.
Download Info
×
Paper Access Key
Access Key
Submit
No Access Key (
Request for Download
)
Name
Email
Country
Send Request
Our Certificates
Guidelines
Information For Authors
Information Editorial Board
FAQ
Further Information
Article Processing Charges
Open Access Policy
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
//